An Analysis of the Author Earnings Survey Data
by Amelia Smith
I took a survey about half a year ago and promptly forgot about it. Then I wondered, why doesn’t anyone do those
big surveys lately. All the talk seems to be about Author Earnings
report, which collects and interprets sales from Amazon, focusing on top
sellers and leaving out a lot of the not-so-successful authors like me.
Then I found this, a huge collection of not-yet-summarized data. When
I grabbed the spreadsheet from Hugh Howey’s author earnings survey, I
wanted to find out what it takes to win at this game, and what my
chances are of making a living writing books. I also wound up chasing a
few side collections along the way. Here’s some of what I learned. The
TLDR version? The majority of authors will never
make a living at this, but chances increase both with number of books
written and with years in the game. They get as good as 50/50.
I didn’t pay much attention to the
merits of self-publishing vs “trad,” or to whether the authors in
question used professional editors and/or cover designers.1
Instead, I compared median numbers of books published versus median
income for a variety of groups, mostly divided by number of years in the
game. Through this, we can see if there’s any relationship between
earnings and number of books published per year (there is, but it’s not
straightforward), and whether there’s any point at which an author can
be reasonably assured of making a living (there isn’t). I also
disregarded author’s response to the question of “Are you making a full
time living?” because some said that they were at $12,000 a year, while
others thought they weren’t, even at over $100,000/year. I wound up
using $32,000 a year as my “Making a Living” threshold, because that’s
an Average Joe earns in the US, according to Google.













